Virtual Tarzan - Transformation Architect
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact me

Recent Comments

  • Virtual Tarzan on Cracking the Code of Multi-Cloud Challenges: Your Roadmap to Success
  • Mike on Cracking the Code of Multi-Cloud Challenges: Your Roadmap to Success
  • Ramos on Cracking the Code of Multi-Cloud Challenges: Your Roadmap to Success
  • Virtual Tarzan on The Cloud Strategy Debate: Radical Transformation vs. Cautious Improvement
  • Virtual Tarzan on The Cloud Strategy Debate: Radical Transformation vs. Cautious Improvement

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Azure Architecture
  • Citrix
  • Cloud
  • Cloud Architecture
  • Cloud Strategy
  • Compliance
  • Digital Transformation
  • EUC
  • General
  • Infrastructure Design & Architecture
  • IT Strategy
  • Storage
  • Troubleshooting
  • vCloud
  • VMware
  • vSphere

Archives

  • October 2023
  • July 2023
  • April 2023
  • January 2023
  • September 2021
  • June 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • January 2017
  • October 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • August 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012

Follow me

Virtual Tarzan - Transformation Architect
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact me
General,

The Cloud Strategy Debate: Radical Transformation vs. Cautious Improvement

Transformation vs.  Improvement

Let’s face facts. Most financial services firms have some presence in the cloud but remain anchored to legacy systems and processes. Getting your feet wet won’t cut it anymore. To truly capitalise on the cloud’s potential, you need to take the plunge into full cloud transformation.


Cloud transformation brings to the surface the contested debate: Should you pursue wide-scale cloud transformation or incremental cloud improvements? This choice will shape your cloud strategy and fundamentally impact your ability to compete. But determining the best path forward requires clearly understanding their differences and aligning each option with your specific organisational needs. Let’s examine the distinction between cloud transformation and improvement and how financial institutions can choose the most strategic approach.


What exactly sets cloud transformation and cloud improvement apart? Cloud transformation entails wholesale, sweeping changes to systems, processes, and culture to become fully cloud native. It reimagines core architectures and workflows, shifting them entirely to the cloud. Cloud improvement refers to limited, incremental enhancements to existing cloud platforms. It optimises usage, reduces costs, and smooths operations within current architectures.
Consider a global bank migrating its entire customer relationship management system to a cloud-based Salesforce platform. This exemplifies transformation, requiring massive changes to technology, staff skills, and processes. Alternatively, a retail bank optimising its cloud spend by right-sizing its workloads represents an incremental improvement.


While improvement delivers smaller, steady gains through optimisations, transformation unlocks immense potential value through reinvented operations, customer experiences, and competitive positioning. However, it also requires huge investments of resources, time, and organisational change management. As a financial services CIO, which option aligns best with your business objectives and realities? Let’s explore the key differences between the two approaches:

Focus

Where should your attention be concentrated? Transformation focuses on completely reimagining and rebuilding core systems and processes as cloud native. This means shifting your customer-facing banking apps, data analytics platforms, and back-end workflows entirely to the cloud. Improvement focuses on maximizing the efficiency of existing cloud infrastructure. This entails consolidation, workload balancing, and architecture adjustments within current systems.

Scope

How broadly will changes impact your organization? Transformation requires company-wide cultural and process changes in tandem with cloud adoption. Your staff will need to be reskilled and retrained extensively on new cloud-based systems. Improvement has a much narrower scope centered on technical optimization. While some skills training will be needed, the magnitude of organizational change is much smaller.

Goals

What outcomes are you hoping to achieve? The goals of transformation include increased agility, innovation, stronger customer experiences, and competitive differentiation through cloud capabilities. It opens the door to advanced technologies like AI-driven customer insights. The goals of improvement are smoother operations, cost reductions, and incremental efficiency gains within existing technical architectures.

Timeframes

What is your time horizon? Transformation initiatives often span months or even years. Migrating core banking systems to the cloud involves lengthy transition periods. Improvements are ongoing and continuous, enabling faster returns through bite-sized optimizations.
These are clear differentiators between both approaches. Keep them in mind as you look at your organisation’s unique needs and constraints. Will widescale transformation or targeted improvements better align with your business objectives?

Here are key assessment considerations:

Budget

What are your budget realities? Honestly evaluate if you have the financial resources to fund a full transformation. Migrating core systems to the cloud requires substantial investments in software, infrastructure, services, and training. Improvement needs are lower since changes are contained. What trade-offs are you willing to make in resourcing each approach?

Endorsement

Do you have an executive endorsement? The transformation will fundamentally reshape your technology landscape and processes. This necessitates extensive senior leadership buy-in and alignment on vision. Improvements have a more limited impact so less executive air cover may be needed. But oversight is still useful for priority setting and accountability.

Urgency

How urgent are your pain points? Hair-on-fire issues like immediate cost overruns or scalability constraints make a case for prioritising improvement initiatives. But if you have deep foundational problems impeding growth, transformation may be the bolder cure. Assess how deeply urgent versus systemic your challenges are.

Appetite

What is your risk appetite? In financial services, minimizing disruption is often paramount. Improvements are lower risk since they are confined changes. Transformation brings inherent technology and business risks given wide scope. But the risks of not transforming may become an existential threat. How much risk can you stomach?

Competition

How competitive is your ecosystem? Increasingly, the pace of innovation in financial services is being driven by agile startups. If you face competition from disruptive fintech challengers, standing still is not an option. You may need transformation just to stay in the game.

Let’s suppose staying competitive is your top priority. And continued technical debt and legacy systems are obstructing your ability to innovate. In this case, even with higher costs and risks, embracing cloud transformation rather than incremental improvements may be the strategic choice.

I know change is hard. Believe me, moving entrenched organisations to the cloud requires overcoming deep cultural barriers. But we’re reaching an inflection point. Here are key realities to consider:


Customer expectations have changed – Your customers, including lucrative millennials, new generation X, Y, and Z expect “UBERnised” and seamless mobile and web experiences. If you can’t deliver, they’ll defect.

New competition abounds – Agile fintech disruptors are using the cloud’s flexibility to roll out innovative apps and services fast. Can your change cycle keep pace?

Security realities have evolved – On-premises security controls now lag behind sophisticated cloud platforms like AWS and Azure and GCP. The cloud offers superior security capabilities.

Talent wants to build in the cloud – To attract the best developers and data scientists, you need to provide a modern toolkit. Young talent versed in cloud architectures will find on-prem and similar IaaS on cloud dull.


Data’s value keeps growing – Leveraging data for insights requires cloud analytics, machine learning, and AI tools your legacy systems can’t support.


Let’s have an honest conversation about risk trade-offs. Yes, migrating core banking platforms to the cloud may demand sizeable upfront investments. There could be hiccups as your teams climb the learning curve. But there are also huge risks in standing still! Your infrastructure continues to age, technical debt piles up, legacy supporting talent pool continues to shrink and the competitive gap widens.

Balance Innovation and Optimisation

The choice between widescale cloud transformation or incremental improvements may seem binary. But creative hybrid approaches can help balance these competing demands.


Build the foundation – Foster excitement about what’s possible in the cloud. Prioritise cloud training and skills development for your people.


Consider adopting a hybrid cloud model that keeps some legacy systems in place while allowing transformative new cloud-native applications to be built alongside them. This would enable optimizing critical workloads while innovating selectively.


An iterative, phased approach can also smooth the shift to the cloud. Legacy systems can be progressively modernized through multiple waves of transformation based on priority. This reduces disruption while working toward long-term goals.


Strategic pivoting is another option – remain ready to toggle between periods of intense optimization and innovation as business needs evolve. Emphasize speed and flexibility.


Innovation “labs” or incubators can be launched to build net new cloud-native applications isolated from day-to-day operations. These innovations can be tested before disrupting current systems.


Migration-then-modernisation is another hybrid tactic. First migrate an existing system to the cloud as-is to capture quick wins, then rearchitect over time utilizing cloud capabilities.


The optimal balance likely combines targeted optimisation and bolder innovation aligned with your organisational culture. With the right governance strategies, hybrid approaches allow short and long-term business goals to be advanced simultaneously.

Trust me, in 10 years all financial institutions will rely on the cloud for their core operations. The winners will be those that transformed early and completely. Capturing the full value of cloud technologies requires bold strategies not incremental steps.


So, tune out the clouded thinking and cautious whispers. Don’t be afraid to leap past tip-toeing into the cloud. With the right planned approach, and with the right strategy, you can wow your customers, leave competitors in the dust, achieve significant cost efficiencies, and future-proof your business.

The cloud rewards the bold – so be Bold!


I hope you found the post informative, thank you for reading.


Regards,
Nick

Sharing is Caring!

11 Shares

Something went wrong with the twitter. Please check your credentials and twitter username in the twitter settings.

Previous

Supercharge Your Cloud Transformation: The Game-Changing 10x Mindset Approach

4 months ago
Next

Cracking the Code of Multi-Cloud Challenges: Your Roadmap to Success

4 months ago

14 Comments

Frustrated Architect

July 31, 2023

I would love the chance to help a big bank reimagine its core systems as a cloud architect!!! There are so many cool things we could build. Hopefully some bold CIOs read this and decide to take the plunge.

Reply

Virtual Tarzan

August 7, 2023

Your passion as an architect is coming through! Start small to prove the cloud’s value, earn trust, and expand the vision. With pragmatism and patience, we can convince cautious banks to transform.

Regards,
Nick

Reply

Jay

July 31, 2023

As the head of a financial services startup, I think the risk calculus presented here is right on. The biggest risk is NOT transforming to the cloud fast enough and losing out to new competitors who aren’t chained to legacy tech.

J

Reply

Virtual Tarzan

August 7, 2023

I agree with you, Jay! Legacy anchors incumbents, while startups ride the cloud’s wave. For some, the risk of inaction outweighs the transformation risk. But context matters, one size doesn’t fit all.

Regards,
Nick

Reply

Kate

August 1, 2023

I was intrigued by this article until I got to the Twitter photo! While I appreciate the insight on cloud strategy, I’m definitely more interested in learning about this over coffee sometime .. (:

Reply

Virtual Tarzan

August 7, 2023

You’re too kind, but this cloud author respectfully declines. My decidedly average looks pale next to the genuinely scintillating strategic insights here! Sadly, I am also not a coffee drinker, but I’d relish the chance to engage your mind on the merits of cloud transformation.

Regards,
Nick

Reply

Cyber Guy

August 3, 2023

Thank you for acknowledging the benefits but also the cloud risks. Our security team cringes at overeager cloud conversions. Gradual is good!

Reply

Virtual Tarzan

August 8, 2023

Incremental progress is the safest path. Thank you for reading Cyber Guy.

Regards,
Nick

Reply

Rami

August 4, 2023

I like your style! This type of analysis has broad appeal and applicability for technology executives across industries. You should find a broad audience for your informed point of view at leading tech media brands like Infoword or cio.com!

Reply

Virtual Tarzan

August 7, 2023

Thank you Rami. I’m grateful you found my analysis balanced and widely applicable. Engaging with brand-name publications would be good if it amplifies these insights. But thoughtful feedback like yours is what I value the most!

Regards,
Nick

Reply

Paul

August 5, 2023

While the article makes a thoughtful case for cloud transformation, I believe the risks and complexities involved are understated. As a CIO at a mid-tier bank, migrating our core banking platforms to the public cloud feels akin to rebuilding the engines mid-flight. The article glosses over the immense technical debt within legacy systems that have accrued over decades. The security, regulatory, and vendor lock-in implications of wholesale cloud migration also give me pause. Perhaps for digital-native challenger banks born in the cloud, such transformation is feasible. But for medium to large, complex organizations like ours such transformation is risky.

Reply

Virtual Tarzan

August 7, 2023

Thank you, Paul, for reading the article and your comment. You raise a valid concern about prudent risk management and the unique complexity faced by medium-large incumbent banks. This is precisely why a phased, context-specific approach to cloud transformation is required. A wholesale “big bang” transition would indeed be high risk. However, phased modernisation focused on high-impact workloads can unlock substantial value. With proper security controls, governance, and architectural separation, cloud innovations can be incubated without jeopardising core stability. Technical debt must be addressed, but not used as an excuse for inaction. The risks of gradual obsolescence for organisations anchored to aging systems are also profound, in my opinion. Ultimately, banks need a hybrid strategy balancing pragmatism and vision. Transformation journeys will be winding, but by staying grounded in business value, banks can evolve legacy models to cloud-enabled competitive advantage.

Regards,
Nick

Reply

Mike A

August 6, 2023

As an industry analyst focused on cloud migration, I found your balanced take on cloud transformation versus incremental improvements to be insightful. As organizations plot their journey to the cloud, they need a nuanced view to match their strategy with business context and risk tolerance. Your point that prudent banks require a hybrid approach is spot on from my experience. Change takes time, but standing still isn’t an option either. You encapsulate the tough choices technology leaders face. This is an urgent conversation, and you frame it thoughtfully. My only advice is to dig deeper into the vital role of architecture and governance as the foundation to move fast while managing risk. But overall, fantastic analysis!

Reply

Virtual Tarzan

August 7, 2023

Mike, I’m honored by your thoughtful feedback. I agree that architecture and governance are crucial foundations, perhaps I will examine those dimensions in more depth in a future post. Thank you for contributing to this important discussion.

Regards,
Nick

Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related posts

Multicloud
General,

Cracking the Code of Multi-Cloud Challenges: Your Roadmap to Success

Rocket 10x
General,

Supercharge Your Cloud Transformation: The Game-Changing 10x Mindset Approach

Clear Line of Sight
General,

3 out of 4 Cloud Strategies are not Fit for Purpose – Here is the Why and How to Fix it

Multi-Cloud View
General,

Debunking the 5 Most Common Myths of Multi-Cloud and Understanding the Risk of the Abilene Paradox

Multicloud
Cloud, Cloud Architecture, Cloud Strategy, General,

How to Maximise Benefits from Multi-Cloud Adoption

General,

How to Control your Cloud Cost?

Recent Comments

  • Virtual Tarzan on Cracking the Code of Multi-Cloud Challenges: Your Roadmap to Success
  • Mike on Cracking the Code of Multi-Cloud Challenges: Your Roadmap to Success
  • Ramos on Cracking the Code of Multi-Cloud Challenges: Your Roadmap to Success
  • Virtual Tarzan on The Cloud Strategy Debate: Radical Transformation vs. Cautious Improvement
  • Virtual Tarzan on The Cloud Strategy Debate: Radical Transformation vs. Cautious Improvement

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Azure Architecture
  • Citrix
  • Cloud
  • Cloud Architecture
  • Cloud Strategy
  • Compliance
  • Digital Transformation
  • EUC
  • General
  • Infrastructure Design & Architecture
  • IT Strategy
  • Storage
  • Troubleshooting
  • vCloud
  • VMware
  • vSphere

Archives

  • October 2023
  • July 2023
  • April 2023
  • January 2023
  • September 2021
  • June 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • January 2017
  • October 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • August 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012

Follow me

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact me

© 2019 http://virtualtarzan.com. All rights reserved.